The great dying: JRR Tolkien’s missing mothers by Idrils Scribe

| | |

Fanwork Notes

Some thoughts about women - or the lack of them- in Tolkien's works, but from a rarely told perspective.

Agree? Disagree? Think I am so, so very wrong about this? Please comment!

 

Fanwork Information

Summary:

In the 'real' Middle Ages women died in childbirth in droves. In Tolkien's world motherhood is even more deadly, but in a narrative sense rather than an obstetrical one.

 

Major Characters:

Major Relationships:

Genre: Nonfiction/Meta

Challenges: Analysing Arda

Rating: General

Warnings:

Chapters: 1 Word Count: 1, 220
Posted on 15 July 2018 Updated on 15 July 2018

This fanwork is complete.

Chapter 1

Read Chapter 1

The lack of female characters in the Tolkien’s legendarium has sparked decades worth of debate. Statistics are extremely depressing: 20% of the named characters in the Silmarillion are women, and the numbers are even worse for LOTR.
The Hobbit contains 1 (one!) mention of a female character, Belladonna Took, whose sole purpose is to let readers know that Bilbo does, in fact, have a mother and that the various peoples of Middle-earth should be assumed to reproduce in the usual mammalian fashion.

This dearth of women seems to spring in part from Tolkien's apparent aversion to writing mothers. His women stand on high and narrow pedestals: they are virginal princesses, shield-maidens and half-goddesses, set high above the men who worship them, and therefore asexual and far removed from the physical indignities and mundane tribulations of pregnancy, childbirth and family life.
Once the birth of a child makes it undeniable that any given woman is a flesh and blood character sporting female parts she has actually had sex with, Tolkien no longer knows what to do with her, and she is swiftly removed from the proceedings. The pattern is striking: whenever the Professor created a family, his first action was invariably to excise the mother.

 

 

If you are a woman in Tolkien's universe and your children are destined for anything worth writing home about, you're as good as dead. The maternal mortality rate becomes all the more striking when you realise that half of these deceased ladies are immortal Elves.

- Miriel Serindë, Fëanor’s mother, dies before she can do anything other than procreate. She is probably Tolkien's most 'forgivable' victim because her death it is actually a major plot point.

- Elenwë, mother of Idril and wife of Turgon, conveniently perishes on the way to Beleriand, the only named character to do so, before she might influence events in Vinyamar or Gondolin.

- Aredhel, Maeglin’s mom, dies long before the Fall of Gondolin. I admit her murder is relevant plot-wise, but it still leaves her son motherless for his main story arc.

-Elwing, Elrond and Elros’ mother, is excised from the action shortly after reproducing and has no further influence on the lives of her illustrious sons. She does disappear in a way that actually moves the plot forward, so this is another ‘forgivable’ one.

- The pattern continues into the Third Age. Celebrian seems to exist only so Elrond can have children, after which she is permanently removed just as her family and Rivendell are about to take center stage.

- Again in Rivendell, Gilraen's only contributions to the resurrection of the Northern Kingdom are pushing out Aragorn and dying before he does anything noteworthy.

-The Shire sees another repeat with Primula Brandybuck, Frodo's mom. True to his usual modus operandi Tolkien kills her off long before the events of LOTR, then makes Bilbo a lifelong bachelor, cleverly avoiding an actual mother-figure for the Baggins family.

- JRRT strikes again in Rohan, twice even. Both Theodwyn, mother of Eowyn and Eomer, and Elfhild, King Theoden's wife and the mother of his son Theodred, are dead long before the action comes anywhere near Meduseld. Eowyn certainly is a strong female character, but why are all the other ones dead?

- The maternal killing spree continues in Gondor, where Finduilas, the mother of Boromir and Faramir, finds herself conveniently dead and buried before the War of the Ring gets underway.

 

 

Is execution the worst thing Tolkien does to his poor mothers of Middle-earth? Think again. How about vanishing them without a trace, presumably somewhere beyond the Void?

- In Mirkwood, Thranduil's wife is a non-entity who does not merit a name or even the most cursory explanation of her absence when Bilbo comes to visit. It's a good thing we have Tolkien's essay Laws and Customs among the Eldar, or we might have concluded that Legolas came into existence by Thranduil self-pollinating in some way.

- We might assume the same type of asexual reproduction took place in Dol Amroth, where Prince Imrahil has four children and no mention of or explanation for the lack of a wife.

 

 

Then we have those women who are more of a 'named uterus' than an actual character. They exist only to provide their children with a womb from which to spring, but get no dialogue, character development or significant impact on events, and the plot quickly leaves them behind.

- Nerdanel is the one member of Fëanor's family who plays no part in the great upheavals of her time. Her only noteworthy deed is gestating Fëanor's sons, after which she is left behind in Aman without as much as a by-your-leave. As crown princess of the Noldor she sadly, and rather improbably, has no discernible impact on her husband, all seven of her sons, her people, or the plot.

- Indis, Eärwen and Anaïre, too are conveniently left behind in Aman as the action moves to Beleriand. As with Nerdanel, despite making up the highest echelons of Noldorin society and being right in the center of political power, the only thing about them that is plot-relevant in any way, shape or form is their functioning reproductive system.

- We all know Old Gaffer, Samwise's dad, because Sam just won't shut up about him, all the way to Mordor and back. Has anyone ever heard of Bell Gamgee, his mom? Me neither. At least we know her name, and she is reputedly still alive at the time of LOTR, which is no small feat given the above carnage.

 

 

Let's not over-dramatise, you say. Surely some of Tolkien's women have managed to both survive and remain relevant to the plot arc after birthing a person of note? Well..., the pickings are slim.

- Luthien is admittedly the single most important character in the Silmarillion. She was the only Elf ever to defeat Morgoth in single combat and the only one to recover a Silmaril. Unfortunately she instantly became inconsequential, never to be seen or heard from again, after giving birth to Dior.

- Rosie Cotton is alive and well, but hardly involved in or vital to the plot of LOTR.

- Galadriel may be the one exception: she not only survived childbearing, but went on to a major part in LOTR. That said, her daughter Celebrian is not born yet in the Silmarillion and long gone by LOTR, so Galadriel being a mother is irrelevant to events at hand and mentioned only in passing.

 

 

Melian the Maia, Morwen Eledhwen and Idril Celebrindal are to my knowledge the only mothers in Tolkien's legendarium who manage to do anything relevant or interact in a meaningful way with main characters while also being present in their children’s lives.

 

The Professor has written entire volumes’ worth of fathers: good ones, bad ones, mad ones, homicidal and wise ones. He only ever wrote one kind of mother: the absent one.
Once you start noticing the pattern, it is uncanny how consistently Tolkien removes mothers, their influence and their experiences from his tales. There might be a perfectly reasonable psychological explanation that I am nowhere near qualified to give.

In Tolkien’s world, women are not just underrepresented. They are actively culled from Middle-earth by any possible means as soon as they have given birth.


Comments

The Silmarillion Writers' Guild is more than just an archive--we are a community! If you enjoy a fanwork or enjoy a creator's work, please consider letting them know in a comment.


I like your idea of looking at the women from the perspective of motherhood. You bring up some very valid points. 

I would say Melian and Morwen break the mold as they are not absent mothers and do carry some narrative weight. But they are only two among so many. 

I know Tolkien despised Disney but he does share the absent mother theme that Disney has going  on. But of course so many Disney films and stories are fairy tale based.

very interesting read and good points made.

I know the lack of women is brought up periodically, but it really is stunning to see all the dead/absent mothers listed out like this. Unlike the elves and Men, Hobbit mothers seem to largely escape the "carnage", though at the price of being reduced to mere names in the appendices. (Three out of four hobbits in the Fellowship had living mothers. And Rosie Cotton does seem to manage a normal lifespan, despite having 13 children. But again, that's all 'off camera'.)

I wonder what was going on in Tolkien's mind to produce this effect. (I can think of multiple potential reasons, but Tolkien himself having lost his mother at a relatively young age is the only one that doesn't involve some degree of sexism.)

Thank you for reading and commenting.

Hobbit mothers do seem to have te best life expectancy! The Shire was meant to be a safe haven from all the war and geopolitical upheaval going on elsewhere in Middle-earth, so Tolkien couldn't very well kill off mothers at the same rate as in Beleriand, Gondor or Rohan. That said, he just could not resist doing in Frodo's mom anyway.  

I didn't even mention Dwarves and Orcs: we have only 1 named female Dwarf and not a single female Orc, even though Tolkien explicitly says they reproduce like everyone else so 50% of Orcs is supposedly female.  

Tolkien was orphaned at 12, when his mother died. He lost his father much earlier when he was 3, so if there was any logic to this we should be looking at a list of dead and absent fathers. I'm afraid the explanation is going to involve sexism to some degree. 

If only Tolkien was still alive so we could ask himi

I think there's definitely something there!

I do feel you're overstating individual cases.

I would argue that Gilraen is more important in the Tale of Aragorn and Arwen than you say, even though I agree the way and the moment she dies raises questions.

Nerdanel isn't quite as insignificant as that even in the published Silmarillion text; Feanor listens to her advice at first and that he stops doing so is one of the ways in which he goes off the rails. And, of course, if you take the late HoME version into account, in fact she is a very noteworthy artist and  quarrels with Feanor about his going off with her sons and she is also given a speaking part in this. In any case, she survives, presumably. It's the rest of her family who proceed to die horribly!

Thank you for reading and commenting, I'm so sorry for taking forever to reply!

There definitely is a pattern of women being removed from the narrative before events get underway, and Gilraen fits right into it despite getting a speaking part in the Tale of Aragorn and Arwen. LOTR has no wizened dowager-chieftainess of the Dunedain attending the Council of Elrond to speak on behalf of her people. Neither does Rohan have a strong-willed queen to temper Wormtongue's influence over Theoden, or Denethor of Gondor a wife with enough common sense to tell him to stop watching Palantir and come to bed right now. Sauron might have been defeated a lot faster if they had ;-)

You make an excellent point about Nerdanel's character being far more developed than it seems in the Silmarillion! She does not die (though losing her husband and all of her children does seem like an sure way to die of grief!), but neither does she play any further role in the story, to the point that we never even learn her eventual fate.