Philosophia to Philomythus and Misomythus by pandemonium_213
Fanwork Notes
Although I knew from the beginning that I would lose in this duel of song with the great master, I was nonetheless compelled to offer a response to Tolkien's Mythopoeia: science can impart a sense of wonder equivalent to any great mythological tale, and myths and flights of imagination are necessary to spark the creativity which in turn leads to new ideas and theories.
The form used in Mythopoeia is heroic couplet. As noted in the linked Wikipedia entry, this was the preferred cadence of British Enlightenment poets so Tolkien was “attacking the proponents of materialist progress on their own turf.”
The poetic form represents a vast uncharted territory for me. Thus I am indebted to my fellow “smith,” Moreth, who helped to tweak and polish my versecraft. Many thanks!
Fanwork Information
Summary: For The Duel of Songs challenge: a counterpoint to Tolkien's Mythopoeia. MEFA 2008: First Place, Poetry, General.
Major Characters: Major Relationships: Genre: Poetry Challenges: Duel of Songs Rating: General Warnings: |
|
Chapters: 2 | Word Count: 1, 311 |
Posted on 24 April 2008 | Updated on 24 April 2008 |
This fanwork is complete. |
Chapter 1: Mythopoeia by J.R.R. Tolkien
Read Chapter 1: Mythopoeia by J.R.R. Tolkien
To one who said that myths were lies and therefore worthless, even though "breathed through silver."
PHILOMYTHUS TO MISOMYTHUS
You look at trees and label them just so,
(for trees are `trees', and growing is `to grow');
you walk the earth and tread with solemn pace
one of the many minor globes of Space:
a star's a star, some matter in a ball
compelled to courses mathematical
amid the regimented, cold, Inane,
where destined atoms are each moment slain.
At bidding of a Will, to which we bend
(and must), but only dimly apprehend,
great processes march on, as Time unrolls
from dark beginnings to uncertain goals;
and as on page o'erwitten without clue,
with script and limning packed of various hue,
and endless multitude of forms appear,
some grim, some frail, some beautiful, some queer,
each alien, except as kin from one
remote Origo, gnat, man, stone, and sun.
God made the petreous rocks, the arboreal trees,
tellurian earth, and stellar stars, and these
homuncular men, who walk upon the ground
with nerves that tingle touched by light and sound.
The movements of the sea, the wind in boughs,
green grass, the large slow oddity of cows,
thunder and lightning, birds that wheel and cry,
slime crawling up from mud to live and die,
these each are duly registered and print
the brain's contortions with a separate dint.
Yet trees and not `trees', until so named and seen -
and never were so named, till those had been
who speech's involuted breath unfurled,
faint echo and dim picture of the world,
but neither record nor a photograph,
being divination, judgement, and a laugh,
response of those that felt astir within
by deep monition movements that were kin
to life and death of trees, of beasts, of stars:
free captives undermining shadowy bars,
digging the foreknown from experience
and panning the vein of spirit out of sense.
Great powers they slowly brought out of themselves,
and looking backward they beheld the Elves
that wrought on cunning forges in the mind,
and light and dark on secret looms entwined.
He sees no stars who does not see them first
of living silver made that sudden burst
to flame like flowers beneath the ancient song,
whose very echo after-music long
has since pursued. There is no firmament,
only a void, unless a jewelled tent
myth-woven and elf-patterned; and no earth,
unless the mother's womb whence all have birth.
The heart of man is not compound of lies,
but draws some wisdom from the only Wise,
and still recalls him. Though now long estranged,
man is not wholly lost nor wholly changed.
Disgraced he may be, yet is not dethroned,
and keeps the rags of lordship one he owned,
his world-dominion by creative act:
not his to worship the great Artefact,
man, sub-creator, the refracted light
through whom is splintered from a single White
to many hues, and endlessly combined
in living shapes that move from mind to mind.
Though all the crannies of the world we filled
with elves and goblins, though we dared to build
gods and their houses out of dark and light,
and sow the seed of dragons, 'twas our right
(used or misused). The right has not decayed.
We make still by the law in which we're made.
Yes! `wish-fulfilment dreams' we spin to cheat
our timid hearts and ugly Fact defeat!
Whence came the wish, and whence the power to dream,
or some things fair and others ugly deem ?
All wishes are not idle, not in vain
fulfilment we devise - for pain is pain,
not for itself to be desired, but ill;
or else to strive or to subdue the will
alike were graceless; and of Evil this
alone is dreadly certain: Evil is.
Blessed are the timid hearts that evil hate,
that quail in its shadow, and yet shut the gate;
that seek no parley, and in guarded room,
through small and bare, upon a clumsy loom
weave rissues gilded by the far-off day
hoped and believed in under Shadow's sway.
Blessed are the men of Noah's race that build
their little arks, though frail and poorly filled,
and steer through winds contrary towards a wraith,
a rumour of a harbour guessed by faith.
Blessed are the legend-makers with their rhyme
of things nor found within record time.
It is not they that have forgot the Night,
or bid us flee to organised delight,
in lotus-isles of economic bliss
forswearing souls to gain a Circe-kiss
(and counterfeit at that, machine-produced,
bogus seduction of the twice-seduced).
Such isles they saw afar, and ones more fair,
and those that hear them yet may yet beware.
They have seen Death and ultimate defeat,
and yet they would not in despair retreat,
but oft to victory have turned the lyre
and kindled hearts with legendary fire,
illuminating Now and dark Hath-been
with light of suns as yet by no man seen.
I would that I might with the minstrels sing
and stir the unseen with a throbbing string.
I would be with the mariners of the deep
that cut their slender planks on mountains steep
and voyage upon a vague and wandering quest,
for some have passed beyond the fabled West.
I would with the beleaguered fools be told,
that keep an inner fastness where their gold,
impure and scanty, yet they loyally bring
to mint in image blurred of distant king,
or in fantastic banners weave the sheen
heraldic emblems of a lord unseen.
I will not walk with your progressive apes,
erect and sapient. Before them gapes
the dark abyss to which their progress tends -
if by God's mercy progress ever ends,
and does not ceaselessly revolve the same
unfruitful course with changing of a name.
I will not treat your dusty path and flat,
denoting this and that by this and that,
your world immutable wherein no part
the little maker has with maker's art.
I bow not yet before the Iron Crown,
nor cast my own small golden sceptre down.
In Paradise perchance the eye may stray
from gazing upon everlasting Day
to see the day-illumined, and renew
from mirrored truth the likeness of the True.
Then looking on the Blessed Land 'twill see
that all is as it is, and yet may free:
Salvation changes not, nor yet destroys,
garden not gardener, children not their toys.
Evil it will not see, for evil lies
not in God's picture but in crooked eyes,
not in the source but in the tuneless voice.
In Paradise they look no more awry;
and though they make anew, they make no lie.
Be sure they still will make, not been dead,
and poets shall have flames upon their head,
and harps whereon their faultless fingers fall:
there each shall choose for ever from the All.
Chapter 2: Philosophia to Philomythus and Misomythus by pandemonium_213
J.R.R. Tolkien (“Philomythus” - Lover of Myth) wrote Mythopoeia in response to fellow Inkling, C.S. Lewis (“Misomythus” - Hater of Myth) who said that myths were “lies...breathed through silver.” Tolkien displayed his poetic mastery in Mythopoeia. Even though I take issue with some of his views, I cannot deny the verses are lovely nor do I disagree that myth and art are vital to the culture and thought of mankind. My counterpoint, such as it is, is offered here.
Read Chapter 2: Philosophia to Philomythus and Misomythus by pandemonium_213
You say I look upon the trees and think only oak or beech,
That past their phyla and their forms, my mind will never reach.
You say I gaze upon the stars and reduce their heat to cold
Courses mathematical with no grandeur to behold.
Your lovely verse and lilting rhyme do not properly attest
To the hawk's flight of the dream that lifts the scientist
Who touches trees and sees beneath grey bark and spring-green leaf
The wondrous art within the cells as beautiful as Sheave.
Inane you call equations, view such regiment askance –
The maths that paint what fuels the sun or destroy with Shiva's dance.
But there is beauty in those numbers, just as elf-patterned and fair
As the myth that drives the Moon upon his chariot of air.
Philomythus, Misomythus - there is no black and white.
For cunning to be wrought, steel minds must soar in mythic flight:
To craft together beauty from all those barren facts;
To re-forge the Iron Crown into shining Artefacts.
Chapter End Notes
Philosophia = Lover of Knowledge
Tolkien’s writings on King Sheave may be found in “The Notion Club Papers,” The History of Middle-earth, Vol. IX, Sauron Defeated.
(1) Comment by Robinka for Philosophia to Philomyt... [Ch 2]
This is splendidly done, beautiful, graceful and wonderfully written.
It reminds me of the finest pieces of literature and, in a way, of the dispute between the authors of the Age of Enlightement and those of Romanticism. Knowlegde and science, with their magnifying glass and empiricism, versus art and mythology, all those more spiritual forms of exploring the world. They don't oppose one another in my opinion, as you said -- there is no black and white, only, combined, they constitute what we can name one's cultural heritage.
To me, these lines are the essence of your poem. You made me wonder just how much mathematics and poetry may have in common. And yes, they have a lot -- when a poet counts the syllables of a sonnet to see if their work flows nicely :)
Thank you so much for writing the poem. I cannot really express how much I admire it. It's worth paying for. And forgive my rambling :)
All the best,
Binka
Re: (1) Comment by Robinka for Philosophia to Philomyt... [Ch 2]
Binka,
Thank you so much for the compliments! As noted, this is an alien form of writing for me, but I figured what the heck...I was inspired and gave it a shot. I'm glad the poem "spoke" to you. Like you, I do not believe that Enlightenment and Romaticism are mutally exclusive.
On the commonality of mathematics and poetry - oh, yes! I think our brains naturally seek patterns and rhythms. I confess I know nothing about meter and just kept reading it aloud until it sounded (more or less) "right."
You're not rambling! In fact, I don't think I have ever read anything you have written that is not coherent!
(2) Comment by Moreth for Philosophia to Philomyth... [Ch 2]
From the author who gave the world Glorfindel doing calculus - the argument for the beauty of science :D
You could have knocked me down with a feather when I first read this!
Thank you (again) for sharing it.
Re: (2) Comment by Moreth for Philosophia to Philomyth... [Ch 2]
Hee! Yes, my version of the famous golden-tressed Balrog slayer, Witch King repeller and hobbit-rescuer is a math nerd extraordinaire.
And thank you and thank you again for your fabulous betafication. I'm still chuckling over the notion of this bit of verse being tagged to the Pembroke College door!
(3) Comment by Dawn Felagund for Philosophia to Ph... [Ch 2]
Fantastic work! I am humbled! :)
(Of course, also, as you know, I agree with you. ;)
That final couplet is simply stunning; it wraps up the poem perfectly.
And I relate perfectly to the ideas you convey here, as you know. (Many of those rambling emails have compassed this topic! ;) I remember being a little angsty when I was younger because everyone insisted it was "left brain" and "right brain," and you were either practical and scientific or pie-eyed and creative. And ... I was a little bit of both.
My mom compromised for me once by telling me that my brain was in sideways. So, my sideways brain definitely appreciates how understanding the scientific and empirical enhances appreciation for that more nebulous "artistic beauty." Again, a fine piece of work!
Re: (3) Comment by Dawn Felagund for Philosophia to Ph... [Ch 2]
Thank you. I am honored. :^)
I love your mother's sideways brain analogy. Since you introduced me to that concept, I have used the term frequently! Likewise, art, poetry and myth can enhance technical and scientific creativity.
I'm glad the poem worked for you. It took some temerity on my part to tackle it, but my dark muse was pretty insistent: "Come on. You know you want to respond to those tweedy Inkling fellows!" :^D
Thanks again!
(4) Comment by oshun for Philosophia to Philomythu... [Ch 2]
I have been struggling for two days to respond to this. You are so out of my class, lady, that it isn't even funny (or at all fair!). This is absolutely fabulous.
I have always flattered myself in thinking of the Enlightenment as my intellectual heritage, while my writing could itself be characterized in content and style as unabashedly romantic. I would agree with you and Binka that there should not have to be a division or a debate there. Why should seeing the world as it is have to impede either imagination or rapture? I surely hope not.
Congratulations, from someone who considers herself a hardcore materialist while consistently indulging in the unashamed flights of fantasy.
Re: (4) Comment by oshun for Philosophia to Philomythu... [Ch 2]
"Congratulations, from someone who considers herself a hardcore materialist while consistently indulging in the unashamed flights of fantasy."
Thank you very much! And yes indeed your combination of romanticism with the rational is both very appealing and apparent. I have to say that I see a pattern here: my favorite Tolkienian fan fic (and beyond) authors possess this admixture.
Don't be too impressed. I suspect this poem will be one of those "one hit wonders." :^D
(5) Comment by IgnobleBard for Philosophia to Phil... [Ch 1]
Well, I have no words for something like this so I'll just say I loved both of these, the first like Shakespeare, the second like William Blake. I don't know how you do it, or where it comes from, but these are just incredible. They're beyond any wordsmithing I can do to even properly praise them. If you need me, I'll just be standing over here in awe.
Re: (5) Comment by IgnobleBard for Philosophia to Phil... [Ch 1]
And I'll be over here shuffling my feet and looking up with humility (and a smile) because of your praise. Thank you so much, Mike!
(6) Comment by MithLuin for Philosophia to Philomy... [Ch 2]
Great idea, and nicely executed! I think that Tolkien was not complaining about science (love of knowledge) as such, but of a world view in which that was *all* there was. He was complaining, in short, against a reductionist materialism in which the tree is only worth what you can learn about it. He himself was quite knowledgable in botany, so I doubt he was saying we shouldn't be able to distinguish beech and oak!
But I agree that the opposite danger (only myth, no science) would be just as bleak. You cannot make true myths about the world if you do not understand natural science. So, your counter-point is certainly a message worth stating. I think it is a question of both-and, not either-or, and your poem draws attention to that nicely.
Good luck at MEFA!
Re: (6) Comment by MithLuin for Philosophia to Philomy... [Ch 2]
Thanks so much for the comments and compliments, MithLuin!
On Tolkien's rather mixed views of science and technology: I emphatically agree that there were aspects of science that Tolkien embraced, loved even. I'm well aware of his keen interests in botany* and astronomy. JRRT would certainly want us to understand the difference between oak and beech. :^) He wielded his layman's knowledge in those disciplines to great effect in his legendarium such that his secondary world feels quite real. However, his feelings toward applied sciences and technology were less charitable to say the least. But that's well beyond the scope of an author's response.
Yes, indeed, he was complaining about reductionist materialism! Addressing that complaint underlies my counterpoint. I fall solidly in the reductionist materialism camp, but I respect the beliefs of faithful and rational dualists as per Stephen Jay Gould's concept of nonoverlapping magisteria. Reductionist materialism does not preclude a tremendous sense of wonder at the natural world and the immense complexity and majesty of the material, that is, the universe. The journey of discovery of the material worth of a tree is an amazing one. I hoped to convey that in the little poem. Mythology (and not just Tolkien's) plays into that sense of wonder (at least for me) beautifully and allows me to trigger my imagination.
So yes, in spite of my own reductionist materialism, I'm definitely a both-and person!
I suspect more traditional Tolkien-flavored poetry will be favored in the MEFA08, but I'm nonetheless honored that this was nominated and that my neophyte's effort struck a chord with a discerning reader like you. Thanks again!
*I received my undergrad degree in botany and in spite of my "mind of metal and wheels," I still love -- and need -- trees. :^)
(7) Comment by Gwidhiel for Philosophia to Philomy... [Ch 2]
(I posted this last night on the MEFA Awards site and since posting the same review in an archive doesn't seem to be against the MEFA rules (I'm a newbie to the MEFA's) here it is again)
I have been meaning to review this for more than a week, and at least twice I started to compose a response that I quickly discarded as inadequate.
In short: this rocks. And you know why I think it rocks, but I must elaborate nonetheless: thematically *and* poetically your response is tellement parfait. This is my response to your response to Tolkien's response to C.S. Lewis:
I had never read Tolkien's verse to "Misomythus" (but have now, of course!) and while the words flow beautifully, the binary assumption that myth conveys a truth that is more intimately human, and is therefore more relevant to humans than the cold, hard facts provided by science, is cringe-inducing. Your response neatly reveals Tolkien's apparent misunderstandings -- not only about the beauty that science itself can reveal, but the way that humanity is an inextricable part of the very natural world that science undertakes to understand. To shut out scientific understandings from expansive spiritual thought is to rob oneself of a hugely important dimension of life, and one must wonder how expansive such thought can really be.
It is interesting that humanity has constructed a phantom body of knowledge which re-constructs the real world from its own particular, peculiar vantage (via language, which itself can be examined scientifically). I am interested in understanding how myths and less formal human narratives inform people's understanding of their relationship with the real world, with each other, with their ancestors, etc. But to assume that real beauty of lasting significance to humans can reside only in the fanciful explanations rendered by murky myth is to hold an impoverished view of the world at large, and of humans in particular.
That is what your lovely poem brought to my mind. But you said it much better than I just did!
Re: (7) Comment by Gwidhiel for Philosophia to Philomy... [Ch 2]
Gwidhiel, thank you. Thank you so much for this extraordinary review!
"To shut out scientific understandings from expansive spiritual thought is to rob oneself of a hugely important dimension of life, and one must wonder how expansive such thought can really be."
Exactly. Exactly! I am glad to know I am not the only one struck by the binary nature of "Mythpoiea" and the implication that myth holds a superior truth to cold barren facts. Although I know that JRRT appreciated the sciences (in a pure form), I still can't get past the impression that he really did not quite appreciate the sense of wonder inspired by science and that it does not preclude, to use your words, expansive spiritual thought. I know that many would argue, "Oh, no, Tolkien was not anti-science, see here..." and would cite numerous and legitimate examples. Yet those verses in "Mythopoiea" speak of misunderstanding.
"It is interesting that humanity has constructed a phantom body of knowledge which re-constructs the real world from its own particular, peculiar vantage (via language, which itself can be examined scientifically)."
Very interesting! I love mythologies of all sorts and find their evolution (which I know little about) intriguing.
"I am interested in understanding how myths and less formal human narratives inform people's understanding of their relationship with the real world, with each other, with their ancestors, etc."
And this reminds me that I have a copy of Daniel Lord Smail's book, On Deep History and the Brain, on my bookshelf and I really should get to reading it!
Thanks again, and as always, you stimulate my brain! :^)
- signed pandemonium, a proudly progressive ape.
(8) Comment by SurgicalSteel for Philosophia to Ph... [Ch 2]
I have to say that I rather love this.
Long ago and far away, I was a theology minor as an undergraduate and one course shy of a philosophy minor (in addition to the chem major, so yep, grossly overeducated). As one professor lectured us about the fact that God had made men to be the stewards of the natural world, I shot my hand up into the air and asked if that didn't mean we should learn as much as possible about how the world *worked* so that we could better care for it. She announced to the class that this was a paid announcement from the chemistry department and should be ignored.
But really - what's wrong with wanting to learn about the way the world works? Perhaps to help others or perhaps just to *know.* There's an elegance about the way the human body functions and a beauty to it that can't be understood without studying it - likewise for the equations that tell you why a bird can soar or why the sky is blue or anything else about nature, really. For me, it's appreciated more by understanding it.
I'll stop babbling now. But I loved this.
Re: (8) Comment by SurgicalSteel for Philosophia to Ph... [Ch 2]
Thank you so much for the kind words, SurgicalSteel. I'm honored that what I wrote "spoke" to you.
Although your theology professor's tart comment on the "paid announcement from the chemistry department" (heh) must have been frustrating, your point was -- and is -- an excellent one. Whether one believes that Man's capacity for thought arose entirely from the Touch of the Divine or from millions of years of evolution (as an aside, I love JRRT's allusions to evolution in "Mythopoiea") or a combination thereof, we should use our knowledge to be stewards of the natural world and to do that, we must understand it.
Although C.S. Lewis' remarks that myths are lies breathed through silver has a certain poetry to it, even as a reductionist materialism type, it rankles me that he dismissed them like that. Myths serve as mankind's metaphors. As we study the world -- the universe -- we use metaphor to help make sense of it and to visualize the invisible. I can't help but think of Kekulé's dream of the snakes biting their own tails (the Ouroboros) which led him to think of the planarity and electron distribution of benzene. That story may very well be apocryphal, but it's a great metaphor...and maybe a myth!
OK, now I'm babbling.
Again, many thanks!